indev.com Tech Stack
Live first-party scan of indev.com's tech stack. 2 technologies detected across 3 categories, via Wappalyzer fingerprinting + DNS CNAME + TLS certificate inspection.
Infrastructure Layer
Let's Encrypt
Reverse proxies
Nginx
SSL/TLS certificate authority
Let's Encrypt
Web servers
Nginx
Compare indev.com's Stack
How was this detected?
For indev.com, DetectZeStack identified 2 technologies: 1 via HTTP fingerprinting and 1 via TLS handshake.
Detection runs four independent layers in parallel: HTTP response headers, TLS handshake metadata, certificate issuer inspection, and DNS record lookups. The breakdown above shows which layers fired for this specific domain — some sites carry most of their fingerprint in HTTP, others rely heavily on infrastructure (DNS/TLS).
How indev.com compares
Symmetric diff between indev.com and similar sites detected on DetectZeStack.
vs www.joomag.com — 1 shared, 1 unique here, 3 unique there
Only on indev.com: Let's Encrypt
Only on www.joomag.com: Astro, HSTS, Sectigo
vs inevent.com — 2 shared, 4 unique there
Only on inevent.com: Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HSTS, Linkedin Ads
vs glider.ai — 1 shared, 1 unique here, 4 unique there
Only on indev.com: Let's Encrypt
Only on glider.ai: Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HSTS, Site Kit
Need this data programmatically? Our API detects 7,300+ technologies at 1/50th the cost of BuiltWith. 100 free requests/month, no credit card.
Get Free API Key Chrome ExtensionWhat technologies does indev.com use?
indev.com uses 2 technologies across 3 categories. The full breakdown is listed above, organized by function. Each technology was identified through analysis of HTTP headers, DNS records, TLS certificates, and HTML content.
How is indev.com's tech stack detected?
DetectZeStack identifies technologies on indev.com through multiple detection methods: HTTP response header analysis, HTML and JavaScript content scanning, DNS record lookups, and TLS certificate inspection. This multi-layered approach catches technologies that single-method tools miss.